Intervention effectmodel-written summary

After 12 h of high UV-B, radish chlorophyll content declined approximately 75% from controls.

A claim from Differential UV-B stress reconfigures antioxidant pathways and growth dynamics through coordinated transcriptional and enzymatic regulation in Raphanus sativus L · 2026

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 12 h of high UV-B, radish chlorophyll content declined approximately 75% from controls.

Taxon
Raphanus sativusRaphanus sativust0
Treatment
high UV-B (12 h)e0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
declinede0
Value
75%e0
Comparator
control plantse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Raphanus sativus
Raphanus sativus · TaxonSelf, en:User:Jengod · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under high UV-B (12 h), chlorophyll content, net photosynthesis, and transpiration rate declined by approximately 75%, 63%, and 69%, respectively, compared with control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1411
t0

“Raphanus sativus L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 143–161

Title

Differential UV-B stress reconfigures antioxidant pathways and growth dynamics through coordinated transcriptional and enzymatic regulation in Raphanus sativus L

Rehan Inayat; Aroosa Khurshid; Chang-Yu Zhang Plant Stress 2026. doi:10.1016/j.stress.2026.101332

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-22e4d7b245ca544264b5c54727b570bf9e2833fd9e25920ac5024cbb7c5b7a8c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

uv · physiology: pigments · Raphanus sativus (radish)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.