Claim · model-written summary
Kernel number per panicle was strongly affected by waterlogging.
- Taxon
- Oats
Avena sativat0 - Treatment
- waterlogginge0
- Outcome
- number of kernels per paniclee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The most affected yield components were the number of panicles per plant and the number of kernels per panicle, but their relative sensitivity changed according to waterlogging duration.”
t0“Late Sown Oats”
Title
Iduna Arduini; Marco Baldanzi; Silvia Pampana Frontiers in Plant Science 2019. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01087
Other claims from this paper (14)
- Intervention effect uptake of nitrogen was reduced by waterlogging after 7 days.
- Intervention effect N-concentration of shoots was reduced by waterlogging after 7 days.
- Intervention effect tiller initiation was reduced by waterlogging after 14 days.
- Intervention effect root growth was reduced by waterlogging after 14 days.
- Intervention effect shoot growth was reduced by waterlogging after 21 days.
- Observation All oat plants survived waterlogging.
- Observation Root and shoot relative growth rates and net nitrogen uptake resumed in recovery.
- Intervention effect Straw and root biomass remained lower at maturity with every waterlogging duration.
- Intervention effect Grain yield declined by 42% to about 81% with waterlogging.
- Intervention effect Panicle number per plant was strongly affected by waterlogging.
- Intervention effect Short waterlogging slightly increased tiller fertility.
- Intervention effect Kernels per spikelet decreased slightly and irregularly.
- Association The two oat species may recover inflorescence initiation and size better than other winter cereals.
- Observation Spring waterlogging was highly detrimental to oats.