Claim · model-written summary
All oat plants survived waterlogging.
- Taxon
- Oats
Avena sativat0 - Outcome
- survived waterlogginge0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All plants survived waterlogging”
t0“Late Sown Oats”
Title
Iduna Arduini; Marco Baldanzi; Silvia Pampana Frontiers in Plant Science 2019. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01087
Other claims from this paper (14)
- Intervention effect uptake of nitrogen was reduced by waterlogging after 7 days.
- Intervention effect N-concentration of shoots was reduced by waterlogging after 7 days.
- Intervention effect tiller initiation was reduced by waterlogging after 14 days.
- Intervention effect root growth was reduced by waterlogging after 14 days.
- Intervention effect shoot growth was reduced by waterlogging after 21 days.
- Observation Root and shoot relative growth rates and net nitrogen uptake resumed in recovery.
- Intervention effect Straw and root biomass remained lower at maturity with every waterlogging duration.
- Intervention effect Grain yield declined by 42% to about 81% with waterlogging.
- Intervention effect Panicle number per plant was strongly affected by waterlogging.
- Intervention effect Kernel number per panicle was strongly affected by waterlogging.
- Intervention effect Short waterlogging slightly increased tiller fertility.
- Intervention effect Kernels per spikelet decreased slightly and irregularly.
- Association The two oat species may recover inflorescence initiation and size better than other winter cereals.
- Observation Spring waterlogging was highly detrimental to oats.