Intervention effectmodel-written summary

A seeding rate of 100 kg fad. -1 significantly increased spike number, 1000-kernel weight and grain yield.

A claim from Effects of seeding rates and nitrogen fertilizer levels on productivity of some bread wheat genotypes in Sinai and upper Egypt in sandy soils · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A seeding rate of 100 kg fad. -1 significantly increased spike number, 1000-kernel weight and grain yield.

Taxon
bread wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
a seeding rate of 100 kg fad. -1e0
Outcome
number of spikes m-2, 1000 kernels weight, and grain yielde0
Direction
significantly highere0
Comparator
other seeding ratese0
Setting
Sinai and upper Egyptt1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of some bread wheat genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–101
t1

“Sinai and upper Egypt in sandy soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–141
e0

“The number of spikes m-2, 1000 kernels weight, and grain yield were significantly higher at a seeding rate of 100 kg fad. -1 as compared to other seeding rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–875

Title

Effects of seeding rates and nitrogen fertilizer levels on productivity of some bread wheat genotypes in Sinai and upper Egypt in sandy soils

Omnya Elmoselhy; M. Mohiy; M.A. Mostafa SVU-International Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2022. doi:10.21608/svuijas.2022.111993.1163

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-245e5b1994e2cd71e8aae28a8f1043b24b8d6a732380bc129baec3b53f08aab7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this claim · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

489 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.