Claim · model-written summary
CRBF2 increased N agronomic efficiency by 21.26–22.10% compared with CUF.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae1 - Treatment
- CRBF2e1
- Outcome
- N agronomic efficiencye1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Value
- 21.26–22.10%e1
- Comparator
- CUF treatmente1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“The CRBF1 and CRBF2 treatments significantly increased the rice yield by 5.10–6.77% and 10.41–11.04%, N recovery efficiency by 13.30–17.40% and 21.69–26.75%, and N agronomic efficiency by 10.40–13.91% and 21.26–22.10% compared to the CUF treatment, respectively”
Title
Zhouzhou Wu; Jiaxin Liu; Jiamei Nie; et al. Agronomy 2025. doi:10.3390/agronomy15122786
Other claims from this paper (14)
- Intervention effect CRBF1 increased rice yield by 5.10–6.77% compared with CUF.
- Intervention effect CRBF2 increased rice yield by 10.41–11.04% compared with CUF.
- Intervention effect CRBF1 increased N recovery efficiency by 13.30–17.40% compared with CUF.
- Intervention effect CRBF2 increased N recovery efficiency by 21.69–26.75% compared with CUF.
- Intervention effect CRBF1 increased N agronomic efficiency by 10.40–13.91% compared with CUF.
- Intervention effect CRBF1 increased economic benefits by 8.74–11.16% compared with CUF.
- Intervention effect CRBF2 increased economic benefits by 17.14–17.41% compared with CUF.
- Intervention effect RCRBF1 and RCRBF2 maintained rice yields relative to CUF with 20% less N.
- Intervention effect RCRBF1 and RCRBF2 significantly increased NUE relative to CUF.
- Association Greater rice yields under CRBF were mainly attributed to increased panicle and spikelet numbers per m2.
- Intervention effect Post-anthesis dry matter, N accumulation and flag SPAD values were higher under CRBF than CUF during grain filling.
- Intervention effect Flag photosynthetic rates were higher under CRBF than CUF during grain filling.
- Intervention effect Soil ammonium nitrogen content was higher under CRBF than CUF during grain filling.
- Recommendation The authors recommend applying CRU and CU at a 7:3 ratio in a single basal application in saline–alkali paddies.