Claim · model-written summary
Cane thickness did not significantly differ among nitrogen and biofertilizer treatments in the first season.
- Taxon
- Grapet0
- Treatment
- Nitrogen doses and biofertilizerse1
- Outcome
- cane thicknesse1
- Direction
- no significant differencese0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Verbatim
e0“in the first one no significant differences between these treatments were observed”
e1“Nitrogen doses and biofertilizers caused significant changes on the cane thickness”
t0“Grape”
Title
A. S. El-Sabagh; F. El-Morsy; A. R. Farag 2011
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Forty nitrogen units plus Biogen increased Thompson seedless yield and quality relative to 80 units without biofertilizer.
- Intervention effect Thirty nitrogen units plus Biogen increased Flame seedless yield and quality relative to 60 units without biofertilizer.
- Association Vegetative growth parameters increased with nitrogen rate in both grape cultivars.
- Intervention effect Biofertilizers significantly changed grape growth estimates compared with control.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen dose and biofertilizers significantly changed cane thickness in the second season.
- Intervention effect Full nitrogen plus Biogen gave the highest vegetative growth values.
- Intervention effect Zero nitrogen gave the lowest vegetative growth values in both cultivars.
- Association Cluster weight and total yield increased with nitrogen rate in both cultivars.
- Intervention effect Biofertilizer significantly changed grape yield traits relative to control.
- Association Cluster number per vine increased significantly with nitrogen rate and biofertilizers in the second season.
- Intervention effect Half nitrogen plus Biogen gave the highest yield parameter values.