Claim · model-written summary
Pishtaz showed a stronger response to foliar treatments such as Zn-Met and Zn-EDTA + urea.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Material
- Pishtaze2
- Treatment
- foliar treatments like Zn-Met and Zn-EDTA + ureae2
- Outcome
- responsee2
- Direction
- strongere2
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“This study investigated the responses of two wheat varieties, Alvand (Zn-inefficient) and Pishtaz (Zn-efficient), to various zinc (Zn) fertilization methods”
e2“Pishtaz exhibited a stronger response to foliar treatments like Zn-Met and Zn-EDTA + urea”
Title
Zinc biofortification of wheat through fertilizer and genotype management
Farrokh Tayyari; Hossein Shariatmadari; Karim Shahbazi; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2024. doi:10.1080/01904167.2024.2376252
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Alvand showed a promising trend of elevated grain yield with foliar zinc sulfate application.
- Intervention effect Foliar zinc sulfate + urea enhanced 1000-grain weight in Alvand.
- Intervention effect Zn-EDTA + urea substantially increased spike weight in Pishtaz.
- Association Yield components 1000-grain weight and spike weight were significantly influenced by zinc fertilization.
- Intervention effect Soil application of zinc sulfate was as effective as a method to enhance grain Zn content.
- Intervention effect Soil applications increased Zn levels in flour and bran.
- Intervention effect Foliar treatments influenced Zn content in straw and roots.