Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zn-EDTA + urea substantially increased spike weight in Pishtaz.

A claim from Zinc biofortification of wheat through fertilizer and genotype management · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn-EDTA + urea substantially increased spike weight in Pishtaz.

Material
Pishtaze4
Treatment
Zn-EDTA + ureae4
Outcome
spike weighte4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
substantiallye4

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study investigated the responses of two wheat varieties, Alvand (Zn-inefficient) and Pishtaz (Zn-efficient), to various zinc (Zn) fertilization methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–156
e4

“Zn-EDTA + urea substantially increased spike weight in Pishtaz”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1124

Title

Zinc biofortification of wheat through fertilizer and genotype management

Farrokh Tayyari; Hossein Shariatmadari; Karim Shahbazi; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2024. doi:10.1080/01904167.2024.2376252

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-bb110d64a3a849a84fd34e8081197f299184eb43cf4aa2b0f07301195aa9b6bd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this claim · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Zn(Gly)2 priming increased wheat grain yield by 46% over soil applied Zn sulfate.

    The effectiveness of seed priming with synthetic zinc-amino acid chelates in comparison with soil-applied ZnSO4in improving yield and zinc availability of wheat grain · 2015 · compared with soil applied Zn-sulfate treatment

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Zn amino acid chelates increased grain yield relative to ZnSO4.

    Fortification of Bread Wheat Using Synthesized Zn-Glycine and Zn-Alanine Chelates in Comparison with ZnSO4in a Calcareous Soil · 2020 · compared with ZnSO4 treatment

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. positive
    Foliar zinc treatment improved leaf area, height and spikelet number per spike of bread wheat.

    Zinc Absorption through Leaves and Subsequent Translocation to the Grains of Bread Wheat after Foliar Spray · 2023

    Same directionCited by this paper

  4. no effect
    Zinc application yielded hardly any benefit.

    Landscape positions dictating crop fertilizer responses in wheat-based farming systems of East African Highlands · 2020

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Zinc inhibited non mycorrhizal wheat root dry yield.

    Arbuscular mycorrhizal strategy for zinc mycoremediation and diminished translocation to shoots and grains in wheat · 2017

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Foliar Zn had no significant effect on wheat grain yield.

    Foliar zinc fertilization improves the zinc nutritional value of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain · 2011

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Zinc supply had little effect on wheat biomass.

    Plant growth and cation composition of two cultivars of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) differing in P uptake efficiency · 2001

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Soil Zn fertilisers had no significant effect on grain Zn concentration or yield.

    Site-Specific Factors Influence the Field Performance of a Zn-Biofortified Wheat Variety · 2020

    Opposite direction

502 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this claim · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    The lowest N rates reduced grain number per square metre at any given photothermal quotient.

    The effects of radiation and nitrogen on number of grains in wheat · 1995

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Severe drought with low nitrogen reduced grain yields.

    Nitrogen Nutrition Improves the Potential of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to Alleviate the Effects of Drought Stress during Vegetative Growth Periods · 2016

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Low nitrogen reduced grain yield to 4.3 t/ha.

    The Effects of Prolonged Drought and Nitrogen Fertilizer on Root and Shoot Growth and Water Uptake by Winter Wheat · 1989 · compared with both N and water

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Terminal spikelet production was delayed by about 2 d at these N treatments in Aroona.

    Leaf Emergence, Tiller Growth, and Apical Development of Nitrogen‐Dificient Spring Wheat · 1993

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Nitrogen level, N timing and seeding rate had no significant effect on spring wheat grain yield across environments.

    Seeding Rate and Nitrogen Management Effects on Spring Wheat Yield and Yield Components · 2007

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    ear weight changed with two nitrogen treatments.

    Effect of source‐sink relations and nitrogen nutrition on senescence and N remobilization in the flag leaf of wheat · 1991

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    In some environments, higher nitrogen rates lowered wheat yield.

    Graphic Analysis of Genotype, Environment, Nitrogen Fertilizer, and Their Interactions on Spring Wheat Yield · 2004

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Nitrogen timing did not significantly affect grain yield.

    Hard Red Spring Wheat Response to Row Spacing, Seeding Rate, and Nitrogen · 2008

    Opposite direction

2,052 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.