Claim · model-written summary
Grain yield of coated urea treatment was 9.09–15.06% higher than that of common urea.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- coated urea treatmente3
- Outcome
- graine3
- Direction
- highere3
- Value
- 9.09–15.06e3
- Comparator
- common ureae3
- Setting
- field experimentse0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Three years field experiments were conducted from 1999 to 2002 to evaluate winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield”
e3“On average, the grain, straw, and biomass yield of coated urea treatment was 9.09–15.06, 13.11–14.96, and 11.73–14.99% higher than those of common urea respectively”
Title
Xiaolin Fan; Fangmin Li; Fang Liu; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2004. doi:10.1081/pln-120030675
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Coated urea and common urea both produced significantly higher biomass, grain and straw yields than the control.
- Intervention effect Coated urea and common urea both gave higher NUE and nitrogen fertilizer recovery rate than the control.
- Intervention effect The maximum yield and nitrogen efficiency were observed with coated urea in the three years.
- Intervention effect Straw yield of coated urea treatment was 13.11–14.96% higher than that of common urea.
- Intervention effect Biomass yield of coated urea treatment was 11.73–14.99% higher than that of common urea.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen fertilizer recovery rate (NfUE) of coated urea treatment was 16.50–68.72% more than that of common urea treatment.
- Intervention effect An insufficient N increase (8%) over the normal dosage does not affect yield or nitrogen efficiency.
- Intervention effect A sufficient N increase (20% higher) gave a significant increase in yield, N uptake and NfUE under the experiment condition.