Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Coated urea and common urea both gave higher NUE and nitrogen fertilizer recovery rate than the control.

A claim from Fertilization with a New Type of Coated Urea: Evaluation for Nitrogen Efficiency and Yield in Winter Wheat · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated urea and common urea both gave higher NUE and nitrogen fertilizer recovery rate than the control.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
coated urea and common urea treatmentse1
Outcome
NUE and nitrogen fertilizer recovery ratee1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
field experimentse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three years field experiments were conducted from 1999 to 2002 to evaluate winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–125
e1

“Results showed that both coated urea and common urea treatments produced significant higher biomass, grain, and straw yields, and higher NUE and nitrogen fertilizer recovery rate over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–545

Title

Fertilization with a New Type of Coated Urea: Evaluation for Nitrogen Efficiency and Yield in Winter Wheat

Xiaolin Fan; Fangmin Li; Fang Liu; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2004. doi:10.1081/pln-120030675

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-79574b2d6da6d87fcdc30f1e1d6f23b532c193df1225b0ae75c775c6fabf9987 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

174 papers: 127 positive, 47 negative or no effect

126 papers in the same direction as this claim · 45 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

165 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.