Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The combined treatment gave soluble sugar content of 4.213 mgg −1.

A claim from Combined efficiency of iron nanoparticles (IONPs) and salicylic acid (SA) on in vitro propagation of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) under combined drought and salinity · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment gave soluble sugar content of 4.213 mgg −1.

Taxon
date palmPhoenix dactyliferat0
Treatment
1 mg L −1 IONPs and 50 mg L −1 SAe0
Outcome
soluble sugare0
Direction
beste0
Value
4.213e0
Qualifier
under DSe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of IONPs and SA to the medium was most effective on the contents of organic solutes (soluble sugar, soluble protein, and proline), where the best results (4.213, 2.37, and 1.42) mgg −1 respectively, were obtained using 1 mg L −1 IONPs and 50 mg L −1 SA application under DS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1419
t0

“date palm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–110
t1

“The optimal combination was 1 mg L −1 IONPs and 50 mg L −1 SA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–919

Title

Combined efficiency of iron nanoparticles (IONPs) and salicylic acid (SA) on in vitro propagation of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) under combined drought and salinity

Ahmed Madi Waheed Al–Mayahi South African Journal of Botany 2023. doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2023.09.019

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-2822fc40fca613f0ac075bb4041e034d0970d56bf9124f9405f540eab06d9f59 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

salicylic acid · physiology: osmolytes · Phoenix dactylifera (date palm)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.