Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Seed inoculation with symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria increased bean yield by 0.21–0.54 t/ha, depending on predecessor.

A claim from Features of common bean cultivation technology under the organic farming system · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation with symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria increased bean yield by 0.21–0.54 t/ha, depending on predecessor.

Taxon
beanse1
Treatment
Inoculation of seeds with a preparation based on symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteriae0
Interactor
symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.21–0.54 t/hae0
Qualifier
depending on the predecessore0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of seeds with a preparation based on symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria, depending on the predecessor, provided an increase in yield at the level of 0.21–0.54 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–1059
e1

“for growing beans on the background of green manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–226

Title

Features of common bean cultivation technology under the organic farming system

S.P. Dvoretska; O.H. Liubchych; M.I. Shevchuk Agriculture and plant sciences theory and practice 2025. doi:10.54651/agri.2025.02.05

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-28b01dfd28f7da3128ce18a508cf9a09ea0f056280b32ecba172c4678b507fbc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

156 papers: 131 positive, 25 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this claim · 22 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Bean yield was lowest with zero nitrate.

    GROWTH AND YIELD OF WHITE BEAN (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) IN RESPONSE TO NITROGEN, PHOSPHORUS AND POTASSIUM FERTILIZER AND TO INOCULATION WITH Rhizobium · 1987

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    N levels did not affect yield of either bean cultivar.

    BIOLOGICAL N2 FIXATION AND MINERAL N IN COMMON BEAN–MAIZE INTERCROPPING OR SOLE CROPPING IN SOUTHEASTERN BRAZIL · 2007

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Applied mineral nitrogen resulted in smaller nitrogen harvest indices in Negro Argel.

    Partitioning of nitrogen from biological fixation and fertilizer in Phaseolus vulgaris · 1987

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Application of 120 kg N ha −1 did not increase bean yield.

    RhizobiumInoculation Increases of Bean and Maize Yields in Intercrops on Farms in the Peruvian Sierra · 1994

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    The small nitrogen dose at planting thus negatively affected bean yield.

    Nitrogen and molybdenum fertilization and inoculation of common bean with Rhizobium spp. in two oxisols · 2016

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Final seed yield was not significantly affected.

    Effects of Combined Nitrogen on Nodulation and Growth of Phaseolus vulgaris · 1980

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    N management did not significantly affect the overall yield of dry bean.

    Yield Stability of Dry Bean Genotypes across Nitrogen‐Fixation‐Dependent and Fertilizer‐Dependent Management Systems · 2015

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Foliar application of 10 kg/ha nitrogen before flowering had no effect on seed yield or seed nitrogen concentration.

    Response of field beans ( Vicia faba L cv. Maris Bead) to time of sowing, plant population, nitrogen, and irrigation · 1987

    Opposite direction

147 papers more in this group

See all 156 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this claim · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Inoculated treatments yielded significantly less than the control.

    Effects of Angular Leaf Spot and Rust on Yield Loss of Phaseolus vulgaris · 2001 · compared with control treatment

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    LCS0306 inoculation gave grain yield similar to nitrogen-fertilised controls.

    Formulation of a Highly Effective Inoculant for Common Bean Based on an Autochthonous Elite Strain of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. phaseoli, and Genomic-Based Insights Into Its Agronomic Performance · 2019 · compared with nitrogen-fertilised controls

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Under BGYMV inoculation, PR9556-158 had fewer seeds per pod than PR9556-171.

    Inheritance of Normal Pod Development in Bean Golden Yellow Mosaic Resistant Common Bean · 2004 · compared with PR9556-171

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Rhizobia inoculation did not significantly increase seed yields or reduce the response to N fertilizer.

    Fertilizer responses of dry bean in southern Alberta · 2001

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Rhizobium inoculation under full N did not raise biomass or pod yield.

    Impact of rhizobial inoculation and reduced N supply on biomass production and biological N2 fixation in common bean grown hydroponically · 2017 · compared with non‐inoculation

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Inoculated common bean cultivars showed reductions in pod number, grain number, and grain mass.

    Charcoal rot severity and yield components of common bean cultivars inoculated with Macrophomina phaseolina · 2020

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Inoculation had no effect on yield.

    Field Trials with Canadian Wonder Beans in Malawi · 1973

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Inoculation produced no bean yield response at either site.

    Nitrogen application and inoculation with Rhizobium tropici on common bean in the fall/winter · 2014

    Opposite direction

186 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.