Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fusarium inoculation altered carbohydrate, nitrogen and phenylpropanoid metabolism in the fhb1- NIL.

A claim from A Quantitative Proteomics View on the Function of Qfhb1, a Major QTL for Fusarium Head Blight Resistance in Wheat · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium inoculation altered carbohydrate, nitrogen and phenylpropanoid metabolism in the fhb1- NIL.

Treatment
Fusarium inoculationse0
Interactor
FusariumFusariume0pathogen
Outcome
metabolism of carbohydrates, nitrogen and phenylpropanoidse0
Direction
alterede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium
Fusarium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the absence of Qfhb1, Fusarium inoculations severely damaged photosynthetic machinery; altered the metabolism of carbohydrates, nitrogen and phenylpropanoids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1101–1261
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113

Title

A Quantitative Proteomics View on the Function of Qfhb1, a Major QTL for Fusarium Head Blight Resistance in Wheat

Moustafa Eldakak; Aayudh Das; Yongbin Zhuang; et al. Pathogens 2018. doi:10.3390/pathogens7030058

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-2a6ddd4aecfa4a7e243134d9d5fe88206fc23642dce65521b83dc5cc7a63d0cd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

Fusarium · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 12 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.