Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In 2008 NPK plots yielded 989 kg. ha -1 of grain.

A claim from Assessing soil nutrient change under long-term application of mineral fertilizer micro-dosing to pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] on a sahelian sandy soil · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2008 NPK plots yielded 989 kg. ha -1 of grain.

Taxon
pearl milletCenchrus americanust0
Treatment
6g per hill of NPKe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
989 kg. ha -1e0
Qualifier
In 2008e0
Comparator
control plotse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cenchrus americanus
Cenchrus americanus · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2008, an average grain yield of 732 kg. ha -1 and 989 kg. ha -1 was obtained respectively for the control plots and 6g per hill of NPK plots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1621
t0

“pearl millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–109

Title

Assessing soil nutrient change under long-term application of mineral fertilizer micro-dosing to pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] on a sahelian sandy soil

Sani Issa Mahaman Sanoussi; Fatondji Dougbedji; Ezenwa Matthew; et al. EURASIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE (EJSS) 2020. doi:10.18393/ejss.642212

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-2aa044b8ec3c2c02705b6b78ff01787b1395b839fe6a726cfbb5a0d469c6c3ba · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Cenchrus americanus (pearl millet)Positive and negative results

259 papers: 249 positive, 10 negative or no effect

248 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

250 papers more in this group

See all 259 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.