Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Direct Neem Azal spray caused 31% pupal mortality, significantly above Karate at 3.6%.

A claim from Parasitism Of Plutella Xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) By Cotesia Plutellaekurdjumov (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) And Parasitoid Development On Brassica Oleracea L. Sprayed With Insecticides · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct Neem Azal spray caused 31% pupal mortality, significantly above Karate at 3.6%.

Taxon
Brassica Oleracea L.t0
Treatment
Neem Azal as spraye0
Interactor
Cotesia Plutellaekurdjumovt0other
Outcome
mortalitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
31%e0
Qualifier
3.6%e0
Comparator
Karatee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Verbatim

t0

“Cotesia Plutellaekurdjumov (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) And Parasitoid Development On Brassica Oleracea L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–172
e0

“A significantly higher mortality of 31% (p < 0.05) was recorded in the pupae exposed directly to Neem Azal as spray whereas Karate caused only 3.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1605–1752

Title

Parasitism Of Plutella Xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) By Cotesia Plutellaekurdjumov (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) And Parasitoid Development On Brassica Oleracea L. Sprayed With Insecticides

M.A. Cobblah; E. O. Owusu; Michael Osae Ghana Journal of Horticulture 2012

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-2ada2f2e5913a4fcdc8a57485dee92a45fe92be217b7b32f59fa8864c0a447de · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

application · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

27 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

botanical · pest · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

78 papers: 65 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 65 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 78 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.