Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Increasing K in the nutrient solution increased the edible biomass index of sweetpotato, though not significantly.

A claim from ALTERING NUTRIENT SOLUTION N:K RATIO TO INCREASE YIELDS OF SWEETPOTATO GROWN IN NFT · 1994

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing K in the nutrient solution increased the edible biomass index of sweetpotato, though not significantly.

Taxon
sweetpotatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
K was increased in the nutrient solutione2
Outcome
edible biomass indexe2
Direction
increasede2
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth of `TI-155' sweetpotato [Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam] was evaluated in a greenhouse”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 56–143
e2

“Storage root fresh and dry weights, growth rate (g m -2 d -1 ), fibrous root dry weight, foliage fresh and dry weights, and edible biomass index (root mass/total plant mass), though not significant all increased as K was increased in the nutrient solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–1011

Title

ALTERING NUTRIENT SOLUTION N:K RATIO TO INCREASE YIELDS OF SWEETPOTATO GROWN IN NFT

D.G. Mortley; P A. Loretan; A.A Trotman; et al. HortScience 1994. doi:10.21273/hortsci.29.7.731b

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-2ada810d16b4c5dd19dde42a61cccedad010e27db8a21c338e10f021d25142c6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

fertilization · growth · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results differ

63 papers: 53 positive, 10 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

54 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.