Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Organic fertilizer increased lentil nodule fresh weight 27%.

A claim from Comparative Efficacy of Rock Phosphate Enriched Organic Fertilizer vs. Mineral Phosphatic Fertilizer for Nodulation, Growth and Yield of Lentil · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer increased lentil nodule fresh weight 27%.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
RP-enriched organic fertilizer @ 1000 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
fresh weight of nodulese0
Direction
increasee0
Value
27e0
Comparator
chemical phosphatic fertilizere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of RP-enriched organic fertilizer @ 1000 kg ha -1 showed an increase of 35.5, 27 and 6% in number of nodules, fresh weight of nodules, and grain yield compared to chemical phosphatic fertilizer, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1323
t0

“lentil”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 137–143

Title

Comparative Efficacy of Rock Phosphate Enriched Organic Fertilizer vs. Mineral Phosphatic Fertilizer for Nodulation, Growth and Yield of Lentil

Allah Ditta; Muhammad Arshad; Zahir A. Zahir; et al. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 2015. doi:10.17957/ijab/17.3.14.954

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-2b4239fc73dc065d9b66627b0851709b96535a0a3cd721ff72d3ebb194287e58 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fertilization · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.