Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Root applied glycinebetaine did not harm PSII photochemistry.

A claim from Glycinebetaine Improved Photosynthesis in Canola under Salt Stress: Evaluation of Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters as Potential Indicators · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root applied glycinebetaine did not harm PSII photochemistry.

Treatment
root‐applied GBe0
Outcome
PSII photochemistrye0
Direction
did not have any adverse effecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root‐applied GB adversely affected the growth of canola plants, it did not have any adverse effect on PSII photochemistry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1553–1674

Title

Glycinebetaine Improved Photosynthesis in Canola under Salt Stress: Evaluation of Chlorophyll Fluorescence Parameters as Potential Indicators

H.‐u.‐R. Athar; Z. U. Zafar; M. Ashraf Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 2015. doi:10.1111/jac.12120

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-2b7a3c1ed4d87db9aa2aba35f024cb4014717faa16ce02219e744c8a7e0a24cb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

glycine betaine · physiology: photosynthesis · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.