Claim · model-written summary
Fruit was smallest under the FIP1 treatment.
- Taxon
- strawberry
Fragaria ×ananassat0 - Treatment
- FIP1e1
- Outcome
- Fruit was the smalleste1
- Direction
- smalleste1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“'Sweet Charlie' strawberry”
e1“Fruit was the smallest in FIP1”
Title
The effects of different periods of shading on growth and yield in 'Sweet Charlie' strawberry
Leyla Demirsoy; Hüsnü Demirsoy; Sezgin Uzun; et al. European Journal of Horticultural Science 2007. doi:10.1079/ejhs.2007/184953
Other claims from this paper (16)
- Intervention effect Shading during the fruiting period reduced runnering in strawberry.
- Intervention effect Shading at the different periods had no consistent effect on crown and leaf number.
- Intervention effect Constant shading (CS) increased leaf area relative to the other treatments in spring and summer.
- Intervention effect Petiole length under GC and CS was higher than under open field in spring and summer.
- Intervention effect Yield was significantly reduced in the FIP1 and FIP2 treatments.
- Intervention effect Shading during the fruiting period reduced inflorescence number and yield.
- Intervention effect Constant shading (CS) significantly reduced all yield parameters.
- Intervention effect Open-field plants had significantly fewer inflorescences and flowers and lower yield per plant than the other treatments.
- Mechanism Lower temperature in the open field possibly prevented flowering or injured flowers, reducing inflorescence and flower numbers.
- Mechanism The increased fruit weight under CS and OF was the result of reduced inflorescence and flower numbers.
- Intervention effect Soluble solid content of fruit was highest under open-field conditions.
- Intervention effect Soluble solid content of fruit was lowest under CS and FP.
- Mechanism High light intensity possibly explains the highest soluble solid content of open-field fruit.
- Intervention effect The amount of discarded fruit was highest on plants shaded during the fruiting period.
- Intervention effect Total discarded fruit was least on open-field plants.
- Intervention effect 'Sweet Charlie' responded negatively to shading overall.