Claim · model-written summary
Open-field plants had significantly fewer inflorescences and flowers and lower yield per plant than the other treatments.
- Taxon
- strawberry
_single2.jpg?width=60)
Fragaria ×ananassat0 - Treatment
- OFe1
- Outcome
- the number of inflorescences and flowers and the yield per plante1
- Direction
- reducede1
- Comparator
- other treatmentse1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_single2.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“'Sweet Charlie' strawberry”
e1“In OF, the number of inflorescences and flowers and the yield per plant was significantly reduced compared to other treatments”
Title
The effects of different periods of shading on growth and yield in 'Sweet Charlie' strawberry
Leyla Demirsoy; Hüsnü Demirsoy; Sezgin Uzun; et al. European Journal of Horticultural Science 2007. doi:10.1079/ejhs.2007/184953
Other claims from this paper (16)
- Intervention effect Shading during the fruiting period reduced runnering in strawberry.
- Intervention effect Shading at the different periods had no consistent effect on crown and leaf number.
- Intervention effect Constant shading (CS) increased leaf area relative to the other treatments in spring and summer.
- Intervention effect Petiole length under GC and CS was higher than under open field in spring and summer.
- Intervention effect Yield was significantly reduced in the FIP1 and FIP2 treatments.
- Intervention effect Shading during the fruiting period reduced inflorescence number and yield.
- Intervention effect Constant shading (CS) significantly reduced all yield parameters.
- Mechanism Lower temperature in the open field possibly prevented flowering or injured flowers, reducing inflorescence and flower numbers.
- Mechanism The increased fruit weight under CS and OF was the result of reduced inflorescence and flower numbers.
- Intervention effect Fruit was smallest under the FIP1 treatment.
- Intervention effect Soluble solid content of fruit was highest under open-field conditions.
- Intervention effect Soluble solid content of fruit was lowest under CS and FP.
- Mechanism High light intensity possibly explains the highest soluble solid content of open-field fruit.
- Intervention effect The amount of discarded fruit was highest on plants shaded during the fruiting period.
- Intervention effect Total discarded fruit was least on open-field plants.
- Intervention effect 'Sweet Charlie' responded negatively to shading overall.