Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Without auxin, softwood and hardwood fig tree cuttings did not differ in rooting, root length or sprouting.

A claim from Effects of auxin and misting on the rooting of herbaceous and hardwood cuttings from the fig tree · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without auxin, softwood and hardwood fig tree cuttings did not differ in rooting, root length or sprouting.

Taxon
fig treee1
Treatment
type of cuttinge4
Outcome
rooting, length of root and sproutinge4
Direction
no differencee4
Qualifier
In the absence of auxine4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Verbatim

e1

“the effects of auxin and misting on the rooting of herbaceous and hardwood cuttings from the fig tree were evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 149–265
e4

“In the absence of auxin, there was no difference between the type of cutting for rooting, length of root and sprouting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–874

Title

Effects of auxin and misting on the rooting of herbaceous and hardwood cuttings from the fig tree

Cleiton Mateus Sousa; Rubens Nei Busquet; Marco Antônio da Silva Vasconcellos; et al. Ciência Agronômica/Revista ciência agronômica 2013. doi:10.1590/s1806-66902013000200016

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-2bf6c7d3c8cd71f4263e61759717e651f82e84caa41db0952484d7ddff6c1f0a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

pruning · quality: postharvest · Ficus carica (common fig)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.