Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Under copper treatment, grafted cucumber roots had significantly higher ROS-scavenging enzyme activities than ungrafted roots.

A claim from Grafting Raises the Cu Tolerance of Cucumber Through Protecting Roots Against Oxidative Stress Induced by Cu Stress · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Under copper treatment, grafted cucumber roots had significantly higher ROS-scavenging enzyme activities than ungrafted roots.

Taxon
CucumberCucumis sativust0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
grafted seedlingse0
Outcome
ROS-scavenging enzymes activitiese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
ungrafted plantse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–44
e0

“the ROS-scavenging enzymes activities in grafted seedlings roots were significantly higher than that of ungrafted plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–598

Title

Grafting Raises the Cu Tolerance of Cucumber Through Protecting Roots Against Oxidative Stress Induced by Cu Stress

Zi-kun ZHANG; Hua LI; Hong-jun HE; et al. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2013. doi:10.1016/s2095-3119(13)60268-3

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-2bfd21e7b687283f84505ace7f61c76b72b4c50d44d9b08caf47b7671fda6e82 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

grafting · physiology: oxidative · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.