Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Corn yield was maximal with uniform 36 in. rows rather than 30 in. rows.

A claim from BENEFITS OF UNIFORM ROW SPACING IN A COTTON-CORN CONSERVATION SYSTEM · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield was maximal with uniform 36 in. rows rather than 30 in. rows.

Treatment
uniform row spacing of 36 in.e0
Outcome
yields of corne0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
narrower row spacing of 30 in.e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum yields of corn were obtained with the uniform row spacing of 36 in. instead of the narrower row spacing of 30 in.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1393

Title

BENEFITS OF UNIFORM ROW SPACING IN A COTTON-CORN CONSERVATION SYSTEM

R. L. Raper 2009

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-2d056dcfa71cd71d2a8e2af09ab4e3a5a00c2277eb92f03758727ef21c062983 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

density · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

658 papers: 519 positive, 139 negative or no effect

518 papers in the same direction as this claim · 132 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

649 papers more in this group

See all 658 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.