Claim · model-written summary
INA restricted pathogen colonization near the inoculation site.
- Taxon
- apple
Malus domesticae1 - Treatment
- 2,6-dichloro-isonicotinic acid (INA)e0
- Outcome
- colonization by the pathogene0
- Direction
- restrictede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Resistance induced with 2,6-dichloro-isonicotinic acid (INA) and benzo(1,2,3-) thiadiazol-7-carbothioic acid-S-methyl ester (BTH, the active component of BION™) restricted colonization by the pathogen to an area adjacent to the inoculation site”
e1“Colonization of apple leaves assayed with a fluorescence microscope was associated with visual disease ratings on plants”
Title
Bogs, J.; Richter, Klaus; Kim, W.-S.; et al. OpenAgrar 2004. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3059.2003.00954.x
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Method / resource GFP labelling facilitated evaluation of host susceptibility and tissue colonization.
- Association Colonization of apple leaves was associated with visual disease ratings.
- Intervention effect BTH restricted pathogen colonization near the inoculation site.
- Association Migration in leaves was associated with symptom formation on pear slices and host plants.
- Observation Non-virulent E. amylovora mutants did not migrate into leaf veins.
- Observation Strains with intermediate-to-low virulence moved slowly.
- Observation Fast-moving strains in GFP assays were dominant independently of apple cultivar.
- Observation Streptomycin-resistant mutants dominated parent strains in tissue colonization.