Claim · model-written summary
Bio-fertilizer, humic acid and compost tea applied to the plants significantly increased clover yield.
TrifoliumNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Using bio-fertilizer; humic and compost tea on plant increases significantly the clover yield”
Title
Fatma Ismail; Salwa Hassanen Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2019. doi:10.21608/jssae.2019.36717
Other claims from this paper (13)
- Intervention effect Whole treatments affected forage yield of Egyptian clover under saline soil conditions.
- Intervention effect Foliar humic acid increased berseem clover plant height, fresh yield and dry yield compared with control.
- Intervention effect Foliar humic acid increased berseem clover seed yield and 1000-seed weight compared with control.
- Intervention effect Foliar humic acid increased crude protein, fiber fraction and total carbohydrate of berseem clover forage compared with control.
- Intervention effect Foliar humic acid increased digestible crude protein of berseem clover forage compared with control.
- Intervention effect Soil EC and pH declined with the foliar applications in the clover trial.
- Observation The highest soil EC, 5.72 dsm-1, occurred with bio-fertilizer.
- Intervention effect Soil properties under all treatments were slightly lower than the control (7.72 dsm-1).
- Observation The minimum total cost was for bio-fertilizer application, 4570 L.E.
- Observation The maximum total cost was for compost tea, 5180 L.E.
- Observation Average total cost over all treatments was 4847.5 L.E for the two seasons.
- Intervention effect Humic acid gave the highest net return per invested L.E (5.40 L.E) compared with N fertilization control (2.63 L.E).
- Intervention effect Compost tea gave a net return of 4.15 L.E per invested L.E, compared with N fertilization control (2.63 L.E).