Claim · model-written summary
Target yield of 10 t/ha gave significantly higher net returns (Rs.92,570/ha).
- Taxon
- maize and chickpea
Cicer arietinum
Zea mayse2 - Treatment
- target yield of 10 t ha-1e1
- Outcome
- net returnse1
- Direction
- Significantly highere1
- Value
- Rs. 92,570 ha-1e1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Significantly higher gross return (Rs.1,33,050 ha-1), net returns (Rs. 92,570 ha-1) and B:C ratio (2.30) were recorded in target yield of 10 t ha-1”
e2“The results indicated that the growth and yield parameters of maize and chickpea at harvest did not influence due to tillage practices”
Title
Hiremath KA; Halepyati AS; Bellakki MA; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2020. doi:10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i2c.8767
Other claims from this paper (17)
- Intervention effect Tillage practices did not influence growth and yield parameters of maize and chickpea at harvest; maize grain and stover yield did not differ significantly among tillage practices.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage with mulch at 5 t/ha gave higher yield parameters than conventional tillage in maize and chickpea.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage with mulch at 5 t/ha gave maize grain yield of 65.9 q/ha, higher than 55.8 q/ha under conventional tillage (64.3 q/ha under zero tillage).
- Intervention effect Nutrient management strategies significantly changed growth and yield parameters of maize.
- Intervention effect Target yield of 10 t/ha gave the highest maize grain yield (69.9 q/ha), significantly higher than target yield of 8 t/ha and 150% RDF.
- Intervention effect Target yield of 10 t/ha gave the highest maize stover yield (89.5 q/ha), significantly higher than target yield of 8 t/ha and 150% RDF.
- Intervention effect Farmers practice gave the lowest maize grain and stover yield (grain 53.6 q/ha; stover 74.3 q/ha), followed by RDF.
- Intervention effect The interaction of tillage and target yield approach had no significant effect on maize grain and stover yield.
- Intervention effect Tillage practices and target yield approaches did not change growth and yield parameters of chickpea.
- Observation Maize equivalent yield of chickpea and system productivity followed the same trend as maize yield.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage with mulch at 5 t/ha gave significantly higher gross returns (Rs.1,25,981/ha) than zero tillage.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage with mulch at 5 t/ha gave significantly higher net returns (Rs.88,017/ha) than zero tillage.
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage gave significantly lower gross return (Rs.1,10,391/ha).
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage gave significantly lower net returns (Rs.69,527/ha).
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage gave a significantly lower B:C ratio (1.70).
- Intervention effect Target yield of 10 t/ha gave significantly higher gross returns (Rs.1,33,050/ha).
- Intervention effect Target yield of 10 t/ha gave significantly higher B:C ratio (2.30).