Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient management strategies significantly changed growth and yield parameters of maize.
- Treatment
- nutrient management strategiese1
- Outcome
- growth and yield parameterse1
- Direction
- differed significantlye1
Zea maysNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“due to nutrient management strategies, the growth and yield parameters of maize differed significantly”
Title
Hiremath KA; Halepyati AS; Bellakki MA; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2020. doi:10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i2c.8767
Other claims from this paper (17)
- Intervention effect Tillage practices did not influence growth and yield parameters of maize and chickpea at harvest; maize grain and stover yield did not differ significantly among tillage practices.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage with mulch at 5 t/ha gave higher yield parameters than conventional tillage in maize and chickpea.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage with mulch at 5 t/ha gave maize grain yield of 65.9 q/ha, higher than 55.8 q/ha under conventional tillage (64.3 q/ha under zero tillage).
- Intervention effect Target yield of 10 t/ha gave the highest maize grain yield (69.9 q/ha), significantly higher than target yield of 8 t/ha and 150% RDF.
- Intervention effect Target yield of 10 t/ha gave the highest maize stover yield (89.5 q/ha), significantly higher than target yield of 8 t/ha and 150% RDF.
- Intervention effect Farmers practice gave the lowest maize grain and stover yield (grain 53.6 q/ha; stover 74.3 q/ha), followed by RDF.
- Intervention effect The interaction of tillage and target yield approach had no significant effect on maize grain and stover yield.
- Intervention effect Tillage practices and target yield approaches did not change growth and yield parameters of chickpea.
- Observation Maize equivalent yield of chickpea and system productivity followed the same trend as maize yield.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage with mulch at 5 t/ha gave significantly higher gross returns (Rs.1,25,981/ha) than zero tillage.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage with mulch at 5 t/ha gave significantly higher net returns (Rs.88,017/ha) than zero tillage.
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage gave significantly lower gross return (Rs.1,10,391/ha).
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage gave significantly lower net returns (Rs.69,527/ha).
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage gave a significantly lower B:C ratio (1.70).
- Intervention effect Target yield of 10 t/ha gave significantly higher gross returns (Rs.1,33,050/ha).
- Intervention effect Target yield of 10 t/ha gave significantly higher net returns (Rs.92,570/ha).
- Intervention effect Target yield of 10 t/ha gave significantly higher B:C ratio (2.30).