Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage gave a significantly lower B:C ratio (1.70).
- Taxon
- maize and chickpea
Cicer arietinum
Zea mayse2 - Treatment
- conventional tillagee1
- Outcome
- B:Ce1
- Direction
- Significantly lowere1
- Value
- 1.70e1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Significantly lower gross return (Rs.1,10,391 ha-1), net returns (Rs. 69,527 ha-1) and B:C (1.70) ratio were recorded in conventional tillage”
e2“The results indicated that the growth and yield parameters of maize and chickpea at harvest did not influence due to tillage practices”
Title
Hiremath KA; Halepyati AS; Bellakki MA; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2020. doi:10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i2c.8767
Other claims from this paper (17)
- Intervention effect Tillage practices did not influence growth and yield parameters of maize and chickpea at harvest; maize grain and stover yield did not differ significantly among tillage practices.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage with mulch at 5 t/ha gave higher yield parameters than conventional tillage in maize and chickpea.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage with mulch at 5 t/ha gave maize grain yield of 65.9 q/ha, higher than 55.8 q/ha under conventional tillage (64.3 q/ha under zero tillage).
- Intervention effect Nutrient management strategies significantly changed growth and yield parameters of maize.
- Intervention effect Target yield of 10 t/ha gave the highest maize grain yield (69.9 q/ha), significantly higher than target yield of 8 t/ha and 150% RDF.
- Intervention effect Target yield of 10 t/ha gave the highest maize stover yield (89.5 q/ha), significantly higher than target yield of 8 t/ha and 150% RDF.
- Intervention effect Farmers practice gave the lowest maize grain and stover yield (grain 53.6 q/ha; stover 74.3 q/ha), followed by RDF.
- Intervention effect The interaction of tillage and target yield approach had no significant effect on maize grain and stover yield.
- Intervention effect Tillage practices and target yield approaches did not change growth and yield parameters of chickpea.
- Observation Maize equivalent yield of chickpea and system productivity followed the same trend as maize yield.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage with mulch at 5 t/ha gave significantly higher gross returns (Rs.1,25,981/ha) than zero tillage.
- Intervention effect Zero tillage with mulch at 5 t/ha gave significantly higher net returns (Rs.88,017/ha) than zero tillage.
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage gave significantly lower gross return (Rs.1,10,391/ha).
- Intervention effect Conventional tillage gave significantly lower net returns (Rs.69,527/ha).
- Intervention effect Target yield of 10 t/ha gave significantly higher gross returns (Rs.1,33,050/ha).
- Intervention effect Target yield of 10 t/ha gave significantly higher net returns (Rs.92,570/ha).
- Intervention effect Target yield of 10 t/ha gave significantly higher B:C ratio (2.30).