Intervention effectmodel-written summary

At 90 DAS, 180 kg N/ha maintained 2.27 percent higher total chlorophyll than 120 kg N/ha.

A claim from Long Term Impact of Tillage Systems, Irrigation and Nitrogen on Soil Properties, Growth, Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Quality of Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 90 DAS, 180 kg N/ha maintained 2.27 percent higher total chlorophyll than 120 kg N/ha.

Organ / stage
90 DASe0
Treatment
180 kg N/hae0
Outcome
total chlorophylle0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.27 percente0
Comparator
120 kg N/hae0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–155
e0

“At 90 DAS, plants fertilized with 180 kg N/ha, retained 26.09 percent higher leaves, and maintained 2.27 percent higher total chlorophyll over 120 kg N/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1469

Title

Long Term Impact of Tillage Systems, Irrigation and Nitrogen on Soil Properties, Growth, Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Quality of Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)

P. K. Singh et.al., P. K. Singh et.al.,; TJPRC International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research 2017. doi:10.24247/ijasraug201772

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-2ea340cb11531bdedb261d905f2d9f5cebf566edd95e84cab1dc47f2710e908f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 18 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

101 papers: 92 positive, 9 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

92 papers more in this group

See all 101 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.