Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Six irrigations increased S uptake by 13.04 percent over four irrigations.

A claim from Long Term Impact of Tillage Systems, Irrigation and Nitrogen on Soil Properties, Growth, Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Quality of Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six irrigations increased S uptake by 13.04 percent over four irrigations.

Treatment
Six irrigationse0
Outcome
uptake of N, P, K, Se0
Direction
highere0
Value
13.04e0
Comparator
four irrigationse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–155
e0

“Six irrigations had 8.0 percent higher grain yield over four irrigations and resulted 9.01, 9.63, 8.12, 13.04 and 40.66 percent higher uptake of N, P, K, S and Fe over four irrigations, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1313

Title

Long Term Impact of Tillage Systems, Irrigation and Nitrogen on Soil Properties, Growth, Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Quality of Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)

P. K. Singh et.al., P. K. Singh et.al.,; TJPRC International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research 2017. doi:10.24247/ijasraug201772

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-a05e9d366a3fa0bdaf2c11dd949d22b23c1247aa974ea06e0efd062227c1f554 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 15 in the model’s answer

irrigation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 74 positive, 29 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this claim · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

94 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.