Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Two irrigations (I3) at CRI and boot leaf stages gave the maximum harvest index (0.44 %) in wheat.

A claim from Effect of Restricted Irrigation on Yield and Yield Attributes of Different Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Varieties · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations (I3) at CRI and boot leaf stages gave the maximum harvest index (0.44 %) in wheat.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
two irrigation (I3) given at CRI and boot leaf stagese0
Outcome
harvest indexe1
Direction
maximume2
Value
0.44 %e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–99
e0

“under two irrigation (I3) given at CRI and boot leaf stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 940–999
e1

“harvest index (0.44 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–925
e2

“Regarding irrigation levels maximum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–698

Title

Effect of Restricted Irrigation on Yield and Yield Attributes of Different Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Varieties

Priya Kumari; Sushil Kumar Pathak; See ma International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2020. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2020.910.404

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-2eeb6ae2002d49e3e1984144a6610348c2b4627e5f6c1ba983291e735bd98f13 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    The I7 irrigation schedule gave the maximum effective tillers at harvest, 94.66.

    Effect of irrigation scheduling on the growth and yield of wheat genotypes · 2015

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Irrigation scheduling at 25% MAD of ASM significantly increased wheat grain yield (4.93 t/ha).

    Influence of date of sowing and irrigation regimes on crop growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and its relationship with temperature in semi-arid region · 2001

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. negative
    Minimum irrigation lowered average winter wheat yield by 14% versus full irrigation.

    Performance of Double‐Cropped Winter Wheat–Summer Maize under Minimum Irrigation in the North China Plain · 2006 · compared with fully irrigated treatment (FI)

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Moderately saline water substituted for good quality water during part of the season maintained total wheat grain yield.

    Time of Salt Stress Affects Growth and Yield Components of Irrigated Wheat · 1994 · compared with good quality water

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Saline irrigation caused soil salinization and reduced wheat growth and yield.

    Effect of Straw Biochar on Soil Properties and Wheat Production under Saline Water Irrigation · 2019

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Deficit irrigation in salt-affected soil reduced wheat productivity.

    Collaborative Impact of Compost and Beneficial Rhizobacteria on Soil Properties, Physiological Attributes, and Productivity of Wheat Subjected to Deficit Irrigation in Salt Affected Soil · 2022

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Wastewater irrigation decreased plant height, leaf area and grain yield in wheat.

    Effect of Wastewater Irrigation on Photosynthesis, Growth, and Anatomical Features of Two Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2020

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    An additional 33 mm of irrigation did not increase grain yield.

    Source–sink balance and manipulating sink–source relations of wheat indicate that the yield potential of wheat is sink-limited in high-rainfall zones · 2010

    Opposite direction

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.