Claim · model-written summary
Studied treatment variants did not significantly increase wheat grain protein.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- studied variantse0
- Outcome
- accumulation of proteine0
- Direction
- did not have a significant positive effecte0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“studied variants did not have a significant positive effect on the accumulation of protein in wheat grain”
Title
Il'shat Vafin; Radik Safin Agrobiotechnologies and digital farming 2022. doi:10.12737/2782-490x-2022-12-16
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Autumn Melafen increased winter wheat harvest density by 17.8%.
- Intervention effect Autumn Melafen increased winter wheat yield by 0.48 t/ha.
- Intervention effect Metallocene Universal top dressing increased grains per spike.
- Intervention effect Metallocene Universal top dressing increased yield by 0.43 t/ha.
- Intervention effect Alternating Melafen and Metallocene treatments increased grains per ear.
- Intervention effect Alternating Melafen and Metallocene treatments increased thousand-seed mass.
- Intervention effect Alternating Melafen and Metallocene treatments significantly increased yield by 0.9 t/ha.
- Intervention effect Double Metallocene foliar feeding reduced stagonospora blotch infection of wheat ears.
- Intervention effect Experimental variants did not reduce black head mold damage to wheat ears.