Abstract
The studies were carried out on winter wheat varieties Kazanskaya 560 for three years, of which two (2018, 2019) were characterized by periodically dry phenomena during the spring-summer growing season and one (2020) was with normal moisture. The aim of the work was to study the effectiveness of the use of the Melafen growth stimulator on winter wheat in the autumn period and double foliar feeding in the spring-summer period with the complex liquid fertilizer Metallocene Universal. The studies were carried out on gray forest soil using the recommended agricultural technology for the cultivation of winter wheat. In the course of the research, the influence of the studied preparations and their combinations on the biometric parameters of plants, the development of diseases, the productivity and quality characteristics of winter wheat seeds was studied. It was found that when using the autumn treatment of crops with the growth stimulator Melafen, there was an increase of 17.8% in plant density for harvesting, which is due to the positive effect of the stimulator on the overwintering of winter wheat. As a result, the yield in this variant increased by 0.48 t/ha. The use of only top dressing with Metallocene Universal led to an increase in the number of grains per spike and an increase in yield by 0.43 t/ha. The alternation of treatments (autumn spraying by Melafen; spring-summer spraying by Metalocene Universal) contributed to an increase in the number of grains per ear, an increase in the mass of 1000 seeds, which led to a significant (0.9 t/ha) increase in the yield of winter wheat. Double foliar feeding with Metallocene Universal contributes to some reduction in the infection of an ear of winter wheat with stagonospora blotch. In all experimental variants, there was no decrease in damage to the ear by "black head molds". The studied variants did not have a significant positive effect on the accumulation of protein in wheat grain.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Autumn Melafen increased winter wheat harvest density by 17.8%.
- Treatment
- autumn treatment of crops with the growth stimulator Melafene0
- Outcome
- plant density for harvestinge0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 17.8%e0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“autumn treatment of crops with the growth stimulator Melafen, there was an increase of 17.8% in plant density for harvesting”
Claim · model-written summary
Autumn Melafen increased winter wheat yield by 0.48 t/ha.
Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator
Verbatim
e0“The use of only top dressing with Metallocene Universal led to an increase in the number of grains per spike and an increase in yield by 0.43 t/ha”
e1“As a result, the yield in this variant increased by 0.48 t/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Metallocene Universal top dressing increased grains per spike.
- Treatment
- top dressing with Metallocene Universale0
- Outcome
- number of grains per spikee0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“top dressing with Metallocene Universal led to an increase in the number of grains per spike”
Claim · model-written summary
Metallocene Universal top dressing increased yield by 0.43 t/ha.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“top dressing with Metallocene Universal led to an increase in the number of grains per spike and an increase in yield by 0.43 t/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Alternating Melafen and Metallocene treatments increased grains per ear.
- Treatment
- alternation of treatments (autumn spraying by Melafen; spring-summer spraying by Metalocene Universal)e0
- Outcome
- number of grains per eare0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“alternation of treatments (autumn spraying by Melafen; spring-summer spraying by Metalocene Universal) contributed to an increase in the number of grains per ear”
Claim · model-written summary
Alternating Melafen and Metallocene treatments increased thousand-seed mass.
- Treatment
- alternation of treatments (autumn spraying by Melafen; spring-summer spraying by Metalocene Universal)e0
- Outcome
- mass of 1000 seedse0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“alternation of treatments (autumn spraying by Melafen; spring-summer spraying by Metalocene Universal) contributed to an increase in the number of grains per ear, an increase in the mass of 1000 seeds”
Claim · model-written summary
Alternating Melafen and Metallocene treatments significantly increased yield by 0.9 t/ha.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- alternation of treatments (autumn spraying by Melafen; spring-summer spraying by Metalocene Universal)e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 0.9 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“alternation of treatments (autumn spraying by Melafen; spring-summer spraying by Metalocene Universal) contributed to an increase in the number of grains per ear, an increase in the mass of 1000 seeds, which led to a significant (0.9 t/ha) increase in the yield of winter wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Double Metallocene foliar feeding reduced stagonospora blotch infection of wheat ears.
- Taxon
- winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- Double foliar feeding with Metallocene Universale0
- Interactor
- stagonospora blotche0pathogen
- Outcome
- infection of an eare0
- Direction
- reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Double foliar feeding with Metallocene Universal contributes to some reduction in the infection of an ear of winter wheat with stagonospora blotch”
Claim · model-written summary
Experimental variants did not reduce black head mold damage to wheat ears.
- Treatment
- experimental variantse0
- Interactor
- black head moldse0pathogen
- Outcome
- damage to the eare0
- Direction
- no decreasee0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“In all experimental variants, there was no decrease in damage to the ear by "black head molds"”
Claim · model-written summary
Studied treatment variants did not significantly increase wheat grain protein.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- studied variantse0
- Outcome
- accumulation of proteine0
- Direction
- did not have a significant positive effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“studied variants did not have a significant positive effect on the accumulation of protein in wheat grain”
The same questions in other papers
metallocene · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
873 papers more in this group
See all 877 papers →fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
3,434 papers more in this group
See all 3,438 papers →micronutrient · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.