Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Ten giant foxtail plants per row metre decreased corn dry matter at maturity by 24% in 1994.

A claim from Giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) interference in nonirrigated corn (Zea mays) · 1997

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten giant foxtail plants per row metre decreased corn dry matter at maturity by 24% in 1994.

Treatment
10 giant foxtail plants m −1 of rowe0
Interactor
giant foxtailt0weed
Outcome
Corn dry matter at maturitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
24e0
Qualifier
1994e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) interference in nonirrigated corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 0–75
e0

“Corn dry matter at maturity was decreased 24 and 23% from 10 giant foxtail plants m −1 of row in 1994 and 1995, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–687

Title

Giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) interference in nonirrigated corn (Zea mays)

Jason C. Fausey; James J. Kells; Scott M. Swinton; et al. Weed Science 1997. doi:10.1017/s0043174500092808

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-2fa7da17d126509086569af75a1fee986316ce070ba152f3d3792606c9a716d7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

Alopecurus pratensis · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.