Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The same system minimized weed seed count.

A claim from Tillage, crop establishment and weed management in rice under conservation agriculture system · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same system minimized weed seed count.

Treatment
conventional tillage in CT-CT-ZT systeme0
Outcome
weed seed counte0
Direction
minimume0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly minimum total weed density, weed seed count and higher grain yield, net returns were recorded in transplanted rice with conventional tillage in CT-CT-ZT system with pre-emergence treatment (PE) of butachlor 1.0 kg/ha for Kharif, pretilachlor 1.0 kg/ha PE for Rabi + inter crop with daincha (Sesbania) incorporation and mechanical weeding on 35 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–796
t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–55

Title

Tillage, crop establishment and weed management in rice under conservation agriculture system

Ramaswamy Govindan; C. Chinnusamy Indian Journal of Weed Science 2014

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-30cff2d8df91e012d4d84256bef9fb90d97b4e62aa439c4f523dfa9893c54081 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

tillage · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

86 papers: 71 positive, 15 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Tillage did not influence weed density or dry weight.

    Weed dynamics and productivity of dry direct seeded rice in relation to tillage and weed management practices · 2020

    Opposite directionCites this paper

  2. negative
    Conventional tillage with residue incorporation had higher total weed density than no till with residue retention.

    Conservation tillage and mulching effects on the adaptive capacity of direct-seeded upland rice (Oryza sativaL.) to alleviate weed and moisture stresses in the North Eastern Himalayan Region of India · 2018 · compared with NT-RR

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Tillage systems showed no differences in weed control or listed rice production traits.

    Effect of Cultural Practices on Weed Control and Crop Response in Imidazolinone-Tolerant Rice · 2006

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Ploughing intensity and the type of implement used for land preparation were not significant factors for weed control.

    DETERMINANTS OF IMPROVING PRODUCTIVITY OF DRY-SEEDED RICE IN RAINFED LOWLANDS · 1999

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Tillage intensity did not affect the weed stand.

    Chemical and cultural control of bulrush (Scirpus maritimus L.) and annual weeds in lowland rice (Oryza sativa L.) · 1986

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Strip planting, bed planting and no-tillage yielded relatively more perennial weeds than conventional tillage.

    Continuous Practice of Conservation Agriculture for 3–5 Years in Intensive Rice-Based Cropping Patterns Reduces Soil Weed Seedbank · 2021 · compared with CT

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    The weedy check removed significantly the highest amount of nitrogen through weeds (12.97 kg/ha).

    Weed management in transplanted rice (Oryza sativa) under rainfed, lowland situation · 2001

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Under unweeded control, conventional tillage raised weed nitrogen removal by 37.29% relative to zero tillage.

    Weed removal and crop nutrient uptake as affected by tillage and herbicides in direct-seeded rice-yellow mustard cropping sequence · 2023 · compared with ZT

    Opposite direction

77 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.