Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Micronutrient rate and method did not significantly affect cassava starch content in the first experiment.

A claim from The Response of Micronutrients on Cassava Root Yield of Rayong 72 and Kasetsart 50 · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronutrient rate and method did not significantly affect cassava starch content in the first experiment.

Treatment
rate and method of four micronutrientse0
Outcome
starch contente0
Direction
not one0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rate and method of four micronutrients had an significant and effect on fresh root yield but not on starch content from the first experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 372–517
t0

“Cassava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–41

Title

The Response of Micronutrients on Cassava Root Yield of Rayong 72 and Kasetsart 50

Watana Watananonta NRCT Data Center 2004. doi:10.14456/thaidoa-agres.2004.3

Other claims from this paper (13)

Record rev-313ffc8f917b3d367e7d51a22e75a158e8fb0b7199b5d2e5be3416cd65659a1d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

micronutrient · quality: sugar starch · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.