Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Tuber Yield and Starch Content as Influenced by Different Grades of Micronutrient Mixture at Different Levels in Cassava under Irrigated Condition

S. Suganya; D. Jegadeeswari; T. Chitdeshwari

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) is a perennial shrub and a tuberous root crop well adapted to poor soils and is relatively tolerant to drought, the crop is usually grown under marginal soil and climatic conditions and often with very limited inputs of fertilizers and pesticides. In India, cassava is cultivated in varied agro climatic and pedogenic environments. In Tamil Nadu, it is cultivated mainly for industrial uses, cassava is grown in black soils (Vertisols) and red soils (Alfisols). Cassava nutrient management by blanket fertilizer recommendations over wide areas and soil types over the past 40 years or so in India have resulted in significant yield increase. But when we extrapolate the results from experimental stations to farmers’ fields, the yield cannot be increased beyond a certain level due to the high temporal and spatial variability of soil and plant nutrients. Alleviation of micronutrient deficiencies to improve crop yields is difficult to large temporal and spatial variation in phyto availability of soil micronutrients. The easiest and most straight forward practice to correct micronutrient deficiency is to apply micronutrient fertilizers. Soil application of fertilizer is economically more affordable. Four field experiments were conducted to evaluate three different grades of micronutrient mixtures at graded doses for increasing the productivity and starch content in cassava under irrigated condition. The experiment was conducted in Factorial RBD replicated thrice with Main factor as micronutrient mixture grades (Grade I, Grade 2 and Grade 3) and sub factor as dose of micronutrient mixture (0, 10, 15, 20 and 30 kg ha-1) in two different soils with calcareous and non-calcareous soil in Pethanaickanpalayam block of Salem district during Jan-Feb 2018. Observations on tuber yield and starch content were recorded in all the four experiments. Among the treatments, application of grade 2 micronutrient mixture at 30 kg ha-1 application recorded significantly higher tuber yield (36.8, 35.2, 30.4 and 32.1 t ha-1) and starch content (25.2, 32.0, 24.2 and 24.1%) respectively in YTP 1, MVD 1, Kungumarose and YTP 1 varieties at red non calcareous, red calcareous, black non calcareous and black calcareous soil respectively which was on par with the application of grade 2 at 20 kg ha-1 application. Hence, application of grade 2 micronutrient mixture at 20 kg ha-1 application can be recommended for getting higher tuber yield and starch content besides alleviating micronutrient deficiency and maintaining fertility of cassava growing soils in Tamil Nadu.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grade 2 micronutrient mixture at 30 kg ha-1 gave significantly higher tuber yield than the other treatments.

Material
YTP 1, MVD 1, Kungumarose and YTP 1 varietiese1
Treatment
application of grade 2 micronutrient mixture at 30 kg ha-1e1
Outcome
tuber yielde1
Direction
significantly highere1
Value
36.8, 35.2, 30.4 and 32.1 t ha-1e1
Comparator
the treatmentse1
Setting
Pethanaickanpalayam block of Salem districte2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–34 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the treatments, application of grade 2 micronutrient mixture at 30 kg ha-1 application recorded significantly higher tuber yield (36.8, 35.2, 30.4 and 32.1 t ha-1) and starch content (25.2, 32.0, 24.2 and 24.1%) respectively in YTP 1, MVD 1, Kungumarose and YTP 1 varieties at red non calcareous, red calcareous, black non calcareous and black calcareous soil respectively which was on par with the application of grade 2 at 20 kg ha-1 application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1889–2342 · show in text ↑
e2

“Pethanaickanpalayam block of Salem district during Jan-Feb 2018”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1734–1797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grade 2 micronutrient mixture at 30 kg ha-1 gave significantly higher starch content than the other treatments.

Material
YTP 1, MVD 1, Kungumarose and YTP 1 varietiese1
Treatment
application of grade 2 micronutrient mixture at 30 kg ha-1e1
Outcome
starch contente1
Direction
significantly highere1
Value
25.2, 32.0, 24.2 and 24.1%e1
Comparator
the treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–34 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the treatments, application of grade 2 micronutrient mixture at 30 kg ha-1 application recorded significantly higher tuber yield (36.8, 35.2, 30.4 and 32.1 t ha-1) and starch content (25.2, 32.0, 24.2 and 24.1%) respectively in YTP 1, MVD 1, Kungumarose and YTP 1 varieties at red non calcareous, red calcareous, black non calcareous and black calcareous soil respectively which was on par with the application of grade 2 at 20 kg ha-1 application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1889–2342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grade 2 micronutrient mixture at 20 kg ha-1 gave tuber yield on par with 30 kg ha-1.

Treatment
grade 2 at 20 kg ha-1e1
Outcome
tuber yielde1
Direction
on pare1
Comparator
grade 2 micronutrient mixture at 30 kg ha-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–34 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the treatments, application of grade 2 micronutrient mixture at 30 kg ha-1 application recorded significantly higher tuber yield (36.8, 35.2, 30.4 and 32.1 t ha-1) and starch content (25.2, 32.0, 24.2 and 24.1%) respectively in YTP 1, MVD 1, Kungumarose and YTP 1 varieties at red non calcareous, red calcareous, black non calcareous and black calcareous soil respectively which was on par with the application of grade 2 at 20 kg ha-1 application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1889–2342 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Grade 2 micronutrient mixture at 20 kg ha-1 can be recommended for higher tuber yield and starch content in cassava.

Treatment
grade 2 micronutrient mixture at 20 kg ha-1e3
Outcome
tuber yield and starch contente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–34 · show in text ↑
e3

“Hence, application of grade 2 micronutrient mixture at 20 kg ha-1 application can be recommended for getting higher tuber yield and starch content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2344–2490 · show in text ↑

micronutrient · quality: sugar starch · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

micronutrient · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.