Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Poultry manure at 1 t/ha with 40 cm x 15 cm spacing gave number of pods/plant of 98.47.

A claim from Effect of Organic manrues and Row Spacing on Growth and Yield of Lentil (Lens culinaris L.) · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure at 1 t/ha with 40 cm x 15 cm spacing gave number of pods/plant of 98.47.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
Poultry manure at 1 t/ha + 40 cm x 15 cme0
Outcome
number of pods/plante0
Direction
maximume0
Value
98.47e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of Poultry manure at 1 t/ha + 40 cm x 15 cm (Treatment 6) recorded significantly higher plant height (55.02cm), maximum number of branches/plant (25.60), maximum number of nodules/plant (8.46), higher plant dry weight (7.75 g/plant), maximum number of pods/plant (98.47), maximum number of seeds/pods (1.93), higher seed yield (1.93 t/ha), and higher stover yield (2.69 t/ha), maximum gross return(122350.00 INR/ha), maximum net return (90940.10 INR/ha) and benefit-cost ratio (2.90)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1394
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 65–71

Title

Effect of Organic manrues and Row Spacing on Growth and Yield of Lentil (Lens culinaris L.)

Saroj Kumar; Vikram Singh; Amit Kumar; et al. International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research 2025. doi:10.33545/26174693.2025.v9.i9sh.5566

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-316a511d6e63fef5340490ad10b53a5387dd317c6139bcf6ff90c6abc5afb494 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

99 papers: 86 positive, 13 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

90 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.