Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Wheat-season subsoiling decreased soil bulk density at 30–40 cm at maize maturity in 2018 by 3.87%.

A claim from Soil Compaction and Maize Root Distribution under Subsoiling Tillage in a Wheat–Maize Double Cropping System · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat-season subsoiling decreased soil bulk density at 30–40 cm at maize maturity in 2018 by 3.87%.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
STe0
Outcome
soil bulk densitye0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
3.87%e0
Qualifier
30–40 cm soil depth at maize maturitye0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ST decreased soil bulk density by 3.87% and increased porosity by 5.86% at 30–40 cm soil depth at maize maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1024
t0

“Maize Root Distribution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–43

Title

Soil Compaction and Maize Root Distribution under Subsoiling Tillage in a Wheat–Maize Double Cropping System

Qing Sun; Wu Sun; Zixuan Zhao; et al. Agronomy 2023. doi:10.3390/agronomy13020394

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-328f4ad4b2cc5c19760dbd87643b5509a7375b3c22f578970af0549313a8eb70 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

tillage · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

152 papers: 124 positive, 28 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

143 papers more in this group

See all 152 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.