Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Conventional tillage gave higher rain water use efficiency in finger millet than minimum and zero tillage.

A claim from Influence of conservation tillage and nutrient management practices on performance of rainfed finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.) in Alfisols · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage gave higher rain water use efficiency in finger millet than minimum and zero tillage.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Conventional tillagee1
Outcome
rain water use efficiencye1
Direction
highere1
Value
4.78 kg/ha-mme1
Comparator
minimum and zero tillagee2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Influence of conservation tillage and nutrient management practices on performance of rainfed finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.) in Alfisols”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–152
e1

“Conventional tillage recorded significantly higher grain and straw yields (3041 and 4687 kg/ha), rain water use efficiency (4.78 kg/ha-mm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–554
e2

“as compared to minimum and zero tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–883

Title

Influence of conservation tillage and nutrient management practices on performance of rainfed finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.) in Alfisols

Veeresh Hatti; B.K. Ramachandrappa; Mudalagiriyappa Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development 2018. doi:10.5958/2231-6701.2018.00003.9

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-331dd15cd8aca5bd4f3a811538f14525ec3b1c15a8b1332aeb971f2878d4c0aa · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

tillage · physiology: water · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.