Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Full CA was among the most water-use-efficient methods, especially in 2015/16.

A claim from Conservation Agriculture in Semi-Arid Zimbabwe: A Promising Practice to Improve Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana Gaertn.) Productivity and Soil Water Availability in the Short Term · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full CA was among the most water-use-efficient methods, especially in 2015/16.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
Full CAe6
Outcome
water utilization (WUE)e6
Direction
most efficiente6
Qualifier
especially during the 2015/16 seasone6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effects of CA on finger millet’s (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn) growth, yield and water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–329
e6

“Full CA was also among the most efficient methods in terms of water utilization (WUE), especially during the 2015/16 season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1559–1682

Title

Conservation Agriculture in Semi-Arid Zimbabwe: A Promising Practice to Improve Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana Gaertn.) Productivity and Soil Water Availability in the Short Term

Vengai Mbanyele; Florence Mtambanengwe; Hatirarami Nezomba; et al. Agriculture 2022. doi:10.3390/agriculture12050622

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-7aacbc533b1ff69ddffd00d9ed1fe09b443decd5398899bf3a282fbad6381f1e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

tillage · physiology: water · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.