Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Applying the recommended NPK dose with ZnSO4 gave higher nutrient uptake of N, P and K by rice.

A claim from Indigenous soil nutrient supply and nutrient-use efficiency of rice (Oryza sativa) in Cauvery Delta Zone of Tamil Nadu · 2001

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying the recommended NPK dose with ZnSO4 gave higher nutrient uptake of N, P and K by rice.

Taxon
Oryza sativaOryza sativae1
Treatment
application of recommended dose of NPK along with ZnSOe7
Outcome
nutrient uptake (N, P and K)e2
Direction
highere2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“nutrient-use efficiency of rice (Oryza sativa L.) field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–275
e7

“application of recommended dose of NPK along with ZnSO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1020
e2

“recorded higher grain and straw yields and higher nutrient uptake (N, P and K)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1052–1130

Title

Indigenous soil nutrient supply and nutrient-use efficiency of rice (Oryza sativa) in Cauvery Delta Zone of Tamil Nadu

C. SHARMILA RAHALE; K. SUBRAMANIYAN; V. RAVI Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v64i2.5255

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-336a5fbcdd4954599547f222871f9909a2e30e3484a9c7c0c09bc4e633f5d71b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this claim · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

984 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.