Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combination biopesticide treatments significantly increased onion yield over control in the field, by 26.1% to 28.8%.

A claim from Combination of biopesticide formulations to manage Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cepae disease complex in onion · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combination biopesticide treatments significantly increased onion yield over control in the field, by 26.1% to 28.8%.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
Combination treatments of biopesticidese2
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
increasee3
Value
26.1% to 28.8%e3
Comparator
controle3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fusarium oxysporum f. sp.cepae Schlecht (FOC) infecting onion under nursery and field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–309
e2

“Combination treatments of biopesticides were more effective and reduced the nematode infestation (47.6% to 71.4%) as well as disease incidence of FOC (63.5% to 72.0%), in the field experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–819
e3

“There was a significant increase in the yield (26.1% to 28.8%) of the crop over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–908

Title

Combination of biopesticide formulations to manage Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cepae disease complex in onion

K. Priti; M. S. Rao; Kommana Pavani; et al. Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems 2018

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-337651e7735accf21001294704775586c3839a47fd508036b1b7c01c6b8361e3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

biocontrol · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.