Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Light versus darkness did not significantly affect sporulation incidence.

A claim from Effects of wetness duration, temperature, and light on infection of black spruce seedlings by Botrytiscinerea · 1994

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Light versus darkness did not significantly affect sporulation incidence.

Taxon
black sprucePicea marianae1
Treatment
Lighte0
Interactor
Botrytiscinereae1pathogen
Outcome
sporulation incidencee0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0
Comparator
darknesse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Picea mariana
Picea mariana · TaxonLBM1948 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Light and darkness during the wetness period did not significantly affect sporulation incidence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–918
e1

“black spruce (Piceamariana (Mill.) B.S.P) by Botrytiscinerea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–203

Title

Effects of wetness duration, temperature, and light on infection of black spruce seedlings by Botrytiscinerea

P.G. Zhang; J.C. Sutton Canadian Journal of Forest Research 1994. doi:10.1139/x94-094

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-34aed170a0694271f04472745b887039d895374466de70ba0bb062c5c6d3eb27 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

light · disease · Picea mariana (black spruce)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.