Claim · model-written summary
Tarocco yield rose 25–44% after fosetyl-A1 spraying.
- Material
- cv. Taroccoe0
- Treatment
- fosetyl‐A1t1
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 25–44%e0
- Comparator
- unsprayed treese0
CitrusNot reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Trees of cv. Tarocco had yield increased by 25–44% whereas cv. Monreal yielded 3–16% higher than the unsprayed trees.”
t0“citrus foot rot”
t1“The effectiveness of fosetyl‐A1 against citrus foot rot caused by Phytophthora citrophthora has been evaluated in a 25‐year‐old orchard of sweet orange cv. Tarocco, showing severe symptoms of the disease and in a 10‐year‐old orchard of the clementine‐type mandarin cv. Monreal, apparently healthy.”
Title
Field effectiveness of fosetyl‐AI against citrus foot rot and brown rot1
M. DAVINO; O. GAMBERINI; R. AREDDIA; et al. EPPO Bulletin 1990. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2338.1990.tb01190.x
Other claims from this paper (4)
- Intervention effect Monreal yield was 3–16% above unsprayed trees.
- Intervention effect Tarocco fruit infection was 8.7% after treatment 11 days before inoculation versus 77% without spraying.
- Intervention effect Fruit infection was 32% when inoculated 21 days after treatment, versus 91% without spraying.
- Intervention effect Infection of volkamer lemon fruit and leaves fell sharply as spray number increased.