Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Three irrigations gave the highest net profit of Rs 65256.4 in the first year.

A claim from Performance of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Tillage Practices and Water Regime on Water Productivity and Economics · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment: three irrigations at 22, 65 and 105 DASe1
Outcome: net profite1
Direction: higheste1
Value: Rs 65256.4e1
Comparator: water regimee1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

*Triticum aestivum* · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0
“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–43

e1
“Among water regime highest net profit (Rs 65256.4 and Rs 61976.7 ha-1) with B: C ratio of 2.24 and 2.04 was recorded with the application of three irrigations at 22, 65 and 105 DAS in wheat crop”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1320

Title

Performance of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under Tillage Practices and Water Regime on Water Productivity and Economics

Vineet Kumar; R.K. Naresh; Vipin Kumar Sagar; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2018. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2018.703.357

Other claims from this paper (13)

Intervention effect Wide raised beds had the highest net profit among tillage treatments in the first year.
Intervention effect Wide raised beds had the reported second year net profit.
Intervention effect Wide raised beds yielded a benefit cost ratio of 2.24 in the first year.
Intervention effect Wide raised beds yielded a benefit cost ratio of 2.00 in the second year.
Intervention effect Wide raised beds increased wheat water use efficiency to 15.12 kg grain ha-1 mm in the first year.
Intervention effect Wide raised beds increased wheat water use efficiency to 15.78 kg grain ha-1 mm in the second year.
Intervention effect Wide raised beds increased water use efficiency by 38.67% relative to conventional tillage in 2013-14.
Intervention effect Wide raised beds increased water use efficiency by 39.23% relative to conventional tillage in 2014-15.
Intervention effect Three irrigations gave the highest net profit of Rs 61976.7 ha-1 in the second year.
Intervention effect Three irrigations gave a benefit cost ratio of 2.24.
Intervention effect Three irrigations gave a benefit cost ratio of 2.04.
Intervention effect Wide raised beds yielded water productivity of 1.28 kg ha-3.
Intervention effect Wide raised beds yielded water productivity of 1.18 kg ha-3.

Record rev-364ae4177b96bf431a7916a65854156c33137dbfa4f274aa9613a5a22a50de83 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

negative
Minimum irrigation lowered average winter wheat yield by 14% versus full irrigation.
Performance of Double‐Cropped Winter Wheat–Summer Maize under Minimum Irrigation in the North China Plain · 2006 · compared with fully irrigated treatment (FI)
Opposite direction
no effect
Moderately saline water substituted for good quality water during part of the season maintained total wheat grain yield.
Time of Salt Stress Affects Growth and Yield Components of Irrigated Wheat · 1994 · compared with good quality water
Opposite direction
negative
Saline irrigation caused soil salinization and reduced wheat growth and yield.
Effect of Straw Biochar on Soil Properties and Wheat Production under Saline Water Irrigation · 2019
Opposite direction
negative
Deficit irrigation in salt-affected soil reduced wheat productivity.
Collaborative Impact of Compost and Beneficial Rhizobacteria on Soil Properties, Physiological Attributes, and Productivity of Wheat Subjected to Deficit Irrigation in Salt Affected Soil · 2022
Opposite direction
negative
Wastewater irrigation decreased plant height, leaf area and grain yield in wheat.
Effect of Wastewater Irrigation on Photosynthesis, Growth, and Anatomical Features of Two Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2020
Opposite direction
no effect
An additional 33 mm of irrigation did not increase grain yield.
Source–sink balance and manipulating sink–source relations of wheat indicate that the yield potential of wheat is sink-limited in high-rainfall zones · 2010
Opposite direction
no effect
DI water saving had no effect on wheat yield.
Yield and water productivity of maize and wheat under deficit and raised bed irrigation practices in Egypt · 2012
Opposite direction
negative
Limited irrigation yielded 99% of full irrigation for winter wheat.
Cropping Systems for Stretching Limited Irrigation Supplies · 1993 · compared with fully irrigated
Opposite direction

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.

Other papers on the same question

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results