Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Spring sowing without irrigation gave the lowest chickpea grain yield.

A claim from Effect of sowing dates and different irrigation regimes on morphological characteristics and grain yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) (cultivar 3279 ILC) · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring sowing without irrigation gave the lowest chickpea grain yield.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
spring sowing date with no irrigation treatmente1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
loweste1
Qualifier
because of decreasing growth period and declining water availabilitye1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–137
e1

“Plants of spring sowing date with no irrigation treatment because of decreasing growth period and declining water availability had the lowest plant height, number of nods per plant, number of pods per plant, number of pods with one seeds per plant, seed weight per plant, 100 seed weight and grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2058–2361

Title

Effect of sowing dates and different irrigation regimes on morphological characteristics and grain yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) (cultivar 3279 ILC)

parviz rezvani moghadam; reza sadeghi samarjan DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2009. doi:10.22067/gsc.v6i2.2438

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-36aaf5c8daf2eda67949244f6d020cac7c2d2194a0b34cb26392562b3d0120c7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 16 in the model’s answer

sowing time · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 68 positive, 17 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 67 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Winter sowing produced 70% more seed yield than spring sowing over ten years.

    Superiority of Winter Sowing over Traditional Spring Sowing of Chickpea in the Mediterranean Region · 1997 · compared with spring‐sown crop

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    The hypothesis that winter-sown chickpeas yield substantially more than spring crops held in the regional trials.

    Ascochyta blight and winter sowing of chickpeas. · 1984 · compared with spring crop

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Late-April planting increased chickpea seed yield versus late-May planting by 34% in 1982.

    Planting Date and Temperature Effects on Germination, Emergence, and Seed Yield of Chickpea · 1988 · compared with planting in late May

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Winter-sown chickpea had almost twice the shoot dry matter and seed yield of spring-sown chickpea in 1982/83.

    Root and shoot growth and water use of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) grown in dryland conditions: effects of sowing date and genotype · 1989 · compared with spring-sown crop

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    In 1984/85, winter sowing raised ILC3279 yield by 65% over spring sowing.

    Effect of supplementary irrigation during reproductive growth on winter and spring chickpea (Cicer arietinum) in a Mediterranean environment · 1990 · compared with spring

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Grain yield for late autumn and early and mid-winter planting dates was 50 to 80% greater than the traditional late winter planting date.

    Effect of Planting Date on Winter Kabuli Chickpea Growth and Yield under Rainfed Mediterranean Conditions · 2008 · compared with traditional late winter planting date

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Early-planted chickpea produced 17% more fertile pods per plant.

    Seedling emergence, pod development, and seed yields of chickpea and dry pea in a semiarid environment · 2002 · compared with late-planted chickpea

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Without infection, Thiva and Gravia yielded more under autumn sowing.

    Evaluation of six chickpea varieties for seed yield under autumn and spring sowing · 2001 · compared with spring sowing

    Opposite direction

76 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 113 positive, 11 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 112 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Supplemental irrigation significantly increased grain yield of chickpea and lentil, with less increase in the wet seasons than in the dry seasons.

    Water use and water-use efficiency of chickpea and lentil in a Mediterranean environment · 2000

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    In 1983/84, irrigation raised winter-sown ILC3279 yield by 105% over a crop receiving 229 mm precipitation.

    Effect of supplementary irrigation during reproductive growth on winter and spring chickpea (Cicer arietinum) in a Mediterranean environment · 1990 · compared with a crop receiving 229 mm of precipitation

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    In the first year, 75 mm irrigation at the vegetative stage increased chickpea grain yield by 59% compared with no irrigation.

    IRRIGATION OF CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUML.) INCREASES YIELD BUT NOT WATER PRODUCTIVITY · 2015 · compared with no irrigation

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Irrigation at 15 days with mulch increased grain yield by 16.6% over irrigation at 15 days alone.

    Effect of irrigation and biofertilizer on water use, nodulation, growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinumL.) · 2011 · compared with irrigation at 15 DBS

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Irrigation increased chickpea height, seed yield per plant, and pods per plant.

    The Effect of Irrigation on Spring-sown Chickpea · 2004

    Opposite direction

  6. positive
    Supplemental irrigation during pod setting to grain filling can give over 50% yield gain in rainfed chickpea areas.

    Response of chickpea to varying moisture stress conditions in Ethiopia · 2022

    Opposite direction

  7. positive
    Irrigation only during flowering and pod filling yielded more grain than other deficit irrigation treatments.

    Use of Plant-Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria and Mycorrhizal Fungi Consortium as a Strategy to Improve Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Productivity under Different Irrigation Regimes · 2022 · compared with other water deficit irrigation treatments

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Irrigation increased chickpea seed yield by 916 kg/ha, 44.0%, over three years.

    Effect of Irrigation on Winter‐Sown Chickpea in a Mediterranean Environment* · 1997

    Opposite direction

115 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.