Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Four irrigations gave the highest grain (23.12 q ha-1) over one or two irrigations.

A claim from Effect of different irrigation and fertility levels on dynamic growth and yield of late sown wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four irrigations gave the highest grain (23.12 q ha-1) over one or two irrigations.

Treatment
Four irrigationse0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
highere0
Value
23.12 q ha-1e0
Comparator
two and one irrigatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four irrigations recorded highest plant height (74.63cm), number of tillers (81.33 m-1 row), dry matter accumulation (93.16 g m-1 row) at harvest stage and leaf area index (3.85) at 90 DAS as well as higher grain (23.12 q ha-1) and straw yield (32.37 q ha-1) over two and one irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–659
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–98

Title

Effect of different irrigation and fertility levels on dynamic growth and yield of late sown wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Tejbal Singh; NB Singh; Pramod Kumar; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2018

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-36b18334ca24a6b90a4bcd978f723a8553c1f6bc8308f45791521daf30bdbbeb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this claim · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Minimum irrigation lowered average winter wheat yield by 14% versus full irrigation.

    Performance of Double‐Cropped Winter Wheat–Summer Maize under Minimum Irrigation in the North China Plain · 2006 · compared with fully irrigated treatment (FI)

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Moderately saline water substituted for good quality water during part of the season maintained total wheat grain yield.

    Time of Salt Stress Affects Growth and Yield Components of Irrigated Wheat · 1994 · compared with good quality water

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Saline irrigation caused soil salinization and reduced wheat growth and yield.

    Effect of Straw Biochar on Soil Properties and Wheat Production under Saline Water Irrigation · 2019

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Deficit irrigation in salt-affected soil reduced wheat productivity.

    Collaborative Impact of Compost and Beneficial Rhizobacteria on Soil Properties, Physiological Attributes, and Productivity of Wheat Subjected to Deficit Irrigation in Salt Affected Soil · 2022

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Wastewater irrigation decreased plant height, leaf area and grain yield in wheat.

    Effect of Wastewater Irrigation on Photosynthesis, Growth, and Anatomical Features of Two Wheat Cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2020

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    An additional 33 mm of irrigation did not increase grain yield.

    Source–sink balance and manipulating sink–source relations of wheat indicate that the yield potential of wheat is sink-limited in high-rainfall zones · 2010

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    DI water saving had no effect on wheat yield.

    Yield and water productivity of maize and wheat under deficit and raised bed irrigation practices in Egypt · 2012

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Limited irrigation yielded 99% of full irrigation for winter wheat.

    Cropping Systems for Stretching Limited Irrigation Supplies · 1993 · compared with fully irrigated

    Opposite direction

980 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.