Claim · model-written summary
The corresponding tomato total water consumption deviation was 2%.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Outcome
- tomato total water consumption deviation ratee0
- Value
- 2%e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“their tomato total water consumption deviation rate was 2%”
Title
Zhao Wei-xi Journal of Irrigation and Drainage 2014
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Irrigation frequency had no significant influence on deep percolation or total water consumption.
- Intervention effect Nitrogen fertilizer had no significant influence on deep percolation or total water consumption.
- Observation Deep percolation accounted for 13.8% of irrigation amount.
- Observation Total tomato water consumption was 210.2mm.
- Observation Daily mean tomato water consumption rate was 2.3mm/d.
- Method / resource The deep percolation deviation between 40 cm and 60 cm interfaces was 0.9% of irrigation amount.
- Method / resource Trime tube and Hydra Probe estimates of total tomato water consumption differed by 0.9%, with larger stage differences.
- Recommendation The authors recommended continuous use of one soil water sensor type across crop growth stages.
- Recommendation The authors recommended measuring deep percolation at the depth containing 80% of roots.