Claim · model-written summary
Nitrogen fertilizer had no significant influence on deep percolation or total water consumption.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume1 - Treatment
- nitrogen fertilizere0
- Outcome
- deep percolation and total water consumptione0
- Direction
- no significant influencese0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there were no significant influences of irrigation frequency and nitrogen fertilizer on deep percolation and total water consumption”
e1“water consumption of tomato in greenhouse”
Title
Zhao Wei-xi Journal of Irrigation and Drainage 2014
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Intervention effect Irrigation frequency had no significant influence on deep percolation or total water consumption.
- Observation Deep percolation accounted for 13.8% of irrigation amount.
- Observation Total tomato water consumption was 210.2mm.
- Observation Daily mean tomato water consumption rate was 2.3mm/d.
- Method / resource The deep percolation deviation between 40 cm and 60 cm interfaces was 0.9% of irrigation amount.
- Method / resource The corresponding tomato total water consumption deviation was 2%.
- Method / resource Trime tube and Hydra Probe estimates of total tomato water consumption differed by 0.9%, with larger stage differences.
- Recommendation The authors recommended continuous use of one soil water sensor type across crop growth stages.
- Recommendation The authors recommended measuring deep percolation at the depth containing 80% of roots.